Attorney General Eric Holder is trying his best to slither out of responsibility for Fast and Furious. He was at his Clintonian best as he tried to differentiate between misleading Congress and lying. He also apparently has the poorest memory anyone has ever seen since he can't seem to recall anything of significance about ANYTHING.
Just what in the hell does this man do in his capacity as Attorney General since he can't recall a darn thing and consistently denies involvement, not only about this matter but other controversial cases as well (remember the New Black Panther Party incident)?! He has consistently demonstrated poor judgement with his decisions; he is either incompetent, a liar, or both and for the good of this country he should resign. If he doesn't voluntarily resign, Obama should publicly ask for his resignation, although I won't hold my breath about it.
Dick Morris has a petition that will be sent to your representatives asking that Eric Holder be forced to resign. Please consider signing it, as I have, to try to rid our country of this farcical AG.
Friday, December 9, 2011
Thursday, December 8, 2011
Voter Intimidation?
The NAACP is planning to go to the UN (of all places!) to charge that various states in the U.S. are adopting laws aimed at preventing minorities from voting.
I don't know what's going on in all of the states, but here in Texas the legislature has passed a law requiring a photo ID in order to vote. How egregious!
The "logic" of the argument that this requirement disenfranchises minority voters escapes me. It's not even as if you have to go pay to get an ID, at least in Texas. If you don't have a valid drivers' license or some other acceptable form of ID, the state will provide one for you free of charge.
I would guess that most people have some form of photo ID. Don't the minority voters who would supposedly be barred from voting ever engage in any activity that requires a photo ID? Heck, I recently went to a new doctor and had to show my drivers' license at that office!
Is it possible that Democrats are so vehement in their opposition to this because it reduces the risk of voter fraud? Makes one wonder, doesn't it?
I don't know what's going on in all of the states, but here in Texas the legislature has passed a law requiring a photo ID in order to vote. How egregious!
The "logic" of the argument that this requirement disenfranchises minority voters escapes me. It's not even as if you have to go pay to get an ID, at least in Texas. If you don't have a valid drivers' license or some other acceptable form of ID, the state will provide one for you free of charge.
I would guess that most people have some form of photo ID. Don't the minority voters who would supposedly be barred from voting ever engage in any activity that requires a photo ID? Heck, I recently went to a new doctor and had to show my drivers' license at that office!
Is it possible that Democrats are so vehement in their opposition to this because it reduces the risk of voter fraud? Makes one wonder, doesn't it?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
